Tom Burke
  Tom Burke
Professor
Department of Philosophy
University of South Carolina
Columbia, SC 29208
  Email: burke@sc.edu
Phone: 803-777-3733 / Fax: 803-777-9178
Curriculum vitae (pdf format).

My research centers on applying John Dewey's philosophy of logic to contemporary cognitive science. Currently I am working out details of the connection between classical pragmatism and dynamic logic. The latter link opens a pdf file that is a slide-like overview of some key ideas that are part of a larger project including an exposition of the semantics and a proof system for ability-based languages. Comments, corrections, and criticisms may be sent to burke@sc.edu.

My interests also include conceptions of mind and self as related to the enigma of human origins, particularly as reflected in the naturalistic evolutionary social psychology of George Herbert Mead. I am the author of Dewey's New Logic and co-editor of Dewey's Logical Theory: New Studies and Interpretations.



In his Philosophy of Universal History, Hegel asserts that passion, without doubt, is responsible for all significant accomplishments in history; but—he qualifies—cool passion. When passion is simply a frenzy of turbulent emotion, it is of no use at all. Anyone could be passionate, that way. But it is not easy to maintain that sort of fire which is both critical and creative, that incandescence so supplied with thermal energy that it will not be cooled when the two coldest things in the world come to lodge within it: cool logic and an iron will. The vulgar, false, impotent sort of passion shrinks in terror from the proximity of reflective thought, for it senses that at such a chilly contact it will be frozen out of existence. Hence the symptom of high creative passion is that it seeks to complete itself by uniting with the cooler virtues; that it admits of reflective criticism, without losing its creative energy. It is fire supported with the constancy of clear understanding and a calm will.
— from José Ortega Y Gasset, Mission of the University (1944)

The original determinations of analytical truth, and the final court of appeal with respect to it, cannot lie in linguistic usage, because meanings are not the creatures of language but are antecedent, and the relations of meanings are not determined by our syntactic conventions but are determinative of the significance which are syntactic usages may have. Once we have penetrated the circle of independent meanings and made genuine contact with them by our modes of expression, the appeal to linguistic relationships can enormously facilitate and extend our grasp of analytic truth. But the first such determinations and the final tests must lie with meanings in that sense in which there would be meanings even if there were no linguistic expression of them, and in which the progress of successful thinking must conform to actual connections of such meanings even if this progress of thought should be unformulated.
— from C. I. Lewis, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (1946)

The logic of artistic construction is worth more than a passing notice, whether its product be a painting, a symphony, a statue, a building, a drama, or a novel. So far as it is not evidence of conceit on the part of a specialized class, refusal to admit thought and logic on the part of those who make these constructions is evidence of the breakdown of traditional logic. ... [The artist's] logic is the logic of what I have called qualitative thought. ... Formal necessities, such as can be made explicit, depend upon the material necessity imposed by the pervasive and underlying quality [of the work of art]. Artistic thought is not however unique in this respect but only shows an intensification of a characteristic of all thought.
— from John Dewey, "Qualitative Thought" (1930)

Every expansive era in the history of mankind has coincided with the operation of factors which have tended to eliminate distance between peoples and classes previously hemmed off from one another. Even the alleged benefits of war, so far as more than alleged, spring from the fact that conflict of peoples at least enforces intercourse between them and thus accidentally enables them to learn from one another, and thereby expand their horizons. Travel, economic and commercial tendencies, have at present gone far to break down external barriers; to bring peoples and classes into closer and more perceptible connection with one another. It remains for the most part to secure the intellectual and emotional significance of this physical annihilation of space.
— from John Dewey, Democracy and Education (1916)


University of South Carolina | College of Arts and Sciences | Philosophy Department

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of the page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of South Carolina.